I've committed my t/41 and t/42 changes to subversion. They are not the same as what I submitted to the list.
> Is there any reason to now use skip_all? (Remember, you're wearing > the official "Test Expert" hat now so you need to weigh up the > issues and make recommendations :) We can't use skip_all, because the t/zv_pp* files have to run their non-zv_pp counterparts as well. I put it back the way it was. I wanted to use skip_all so that we aren't doing roll-your-own on things that already are well-defined. > One concern just popped into my head... I'd like to not have to > depend on very recent versions of Test::More. Can you look into > that and make recommendations about what version of Test::More > we should use as a minimum? Earliest on CPAN is 0.45, and that should be just fine. I don't see anything in the Changes file that tells me otherwise. The most "very recent" version of Test::More is from August 2002. xoa -- Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
