Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We'll add a hyper version of all the vtable entries. Since this is going to bloat the hell out of the vtable, we'll do it by adding a VTABLE *hyper to the main vtable structure and hang it off there.
Aren't the relevant vtable slots for aggregates unused anyway?
Only because we've not gotten around to writing the code. :)
I've actually come across the need locally, but haven't had the time in the schedule to write the code that'd be needed. It's easier to get the compiler to generate the long code, though less optimal in the long run.
Can we define that
add Pagg, Pagg, Ix
or such is just the hyper add?
Nope. :) -- Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
