Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We'll add a hyper version of all the vtable entries. Since this is > going to bloat the hell out of the vtable, we'll do it by adding a > VTABLE *hyper to the main vtable structure and hang it off there.
Aren't the relevant vtable slots for aggregates unused anyway? Can we define that add Pagg, Pagg, Ix or such is just the hyper add? The only one that's used is AFAIK C<set Pagg, Ix> which should better be C<set_elements> anyway. leo
