On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 10:34:56PM -0200, Gabor Szabo wrote: > Actually I think there are frameworks in C# to write such Test::More like > tests. But if there are not and someone writes a Test::More replacement > in some other language (C# in our case) then why not write a replacement > for Test::Harness as well in that language ? > What would perl give me in this case ?
The advantage of having your C# tests outputting in Test::Harness format is that you only have one harness, and you don't have to write it :) Also, if you want to run your automated tests every hour (etc), you won't need two (or more) of those as well. //Ed
