Simon Cozens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Arthur Bergman: >> I am wondering how the references to hash elements are planned to be >> done? The call to set_ must somehow be delayed until the time is right. > > I would have thought that a hash element would itself be a PMC rather > than an immediate value, so a reference to that should be treated just > like any other reference to a PMC.
I believe the correct name for this is 'Pair' isn't it?
