Arthur Bergman writes: > > On 6 Jan 2004, at 17:05, Simon Cozens wrote: > > > > >I would have thought that a hash element would itself be a PMC rather > >than an immediate value, so a reference to that should be treated just > >like any other reference to a PMC. > > > > But this does not hold true if the hash element is in fact conjured up > by a call to STORE
Ahh, touchÃ. Well, it wouldn't be so hard to write a Proxy pmc which is constructed with an aggregate and a key, and delegates its assignments and fetches to the aggregate itself. Luke Ã
