On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 08:24:06PM -0500, Matt Fowles wrote: > All~ > > I have a naive question: > > Why must each thread have its own interpreter? > > > I understand that this suggestion will likely be disregarded because of > the answer to the above question. But here goes anyway... > > Why not have the threads that share everything share interpreters. We > can have these threads be within the a single interpreter thus > eliminating the need for complicated GC locking and resource sharing > complexity. Because all of these threads will be one kernel level > thread
Why on earth would they be all one kernel-level thread? -- Monto Blanco... scorchio!
