Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Should "parrot -t 2> /dev/null" work the same as "parrot 2> /dev/null" >> ? (that is, are the results of the program the same except for the >> additional output printed to stderr?) > It should work the same. But currently "-t" leaks memory like a sieve > and is totally unusable for non trivial programs. Actually it doesn't leak memory but it exhausts memory. I'm currently investigating the problem, which is caused by all the DOD/GC blocking mainly in Parrot_vsprintf ... leo
