Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Should "parrot -t 2> /dev/null" work the same as "parrot 2> /dev/null" > ? (that is, are the results of the program the same except for the > additional output printed to stderr?)
It should work the same. But currently "-t" leaks memory like a sieve and is totally unusable for non trivial programs. > When run as "parrot -t tcl.pbc foo.tcl 2> /dev/null", it immediately > exits, This shouldn't happen. > I've saved a snapshot of my code repository if it's needed for > archaeology. Please mail me a copy. I'll have a look at it. leo
