Steve Fink: # On Sep-15, Brent Dax wrote: # > Steve Fink: # > # 2. typedef struct Parrot_Interp stuff. Brent, you're the man -- do you # > # still need some agreement on conventions before you rename our world? # > # > You mean we might actually (gasp!) get this done? Horrors! # # Huh? No, I just like to bring it up once in a while because I really # think it ought to be done. I'm sure it will get lost in the confusion # again.
Certainly. But it's nice to know that you're thinking about it. :^) # > Anyway, I think we'll do Interp * for the internals and Parrot_Interp # > for the external interfaces--any objections to this scheme? # # Fine with me, but you should still get the typedef'ing a pointer past # the gang at large. Argh! Second time in less than a week that I hit the wrong reply button. OK, this'll go to the list--that's why I'm not cutting anything out. # > I'll find some time to hack on this later today. # # Do days start at 12:00am for you, or whenever you wake up? :-) Usually whenever I wake up. Unfortunately, I never found that time--I'm preparing a college application right now, so things are a bit hectic here. And the fact that it's not actually compiling on Win32 doesn't help much. I'll get to it when I can. # > # 4. Win32. I don't know that it's broken, but I'm assuming it is on # > # general principle. # > # > Here's a weird one right off the bat: # # Ugh. I really need to figure out how to get hold of a true Win32 setup # so I can actually contribute an informed opinion on these things... I already patched that thing with the 1s--committed it at 9:30am PDT. The I/O thing is still an issue, but apparently it just involves a patch that Jurgen needs to apply. --Brent Dax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Perl and Parrot hacker "Yeah, and my underwear is flame-retardant--that doesn't mean I'm gonna set myself on fire to prove it."
