Steve Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1. languages/imcc move. Last I heard, this was blocked on Dan & Leo > coming to an agreement over where it, and the rest of the source code, > should go.
Robert said: "We should probably wait until after 0.0.11 for this, to minimize disruption." I'm fine with postponing the move, as long as then the move is into a separate directory :) > 3. 'make languages' and 'make languages-test'. It would be nice to get > these working and including more of the subdirectories. I did my part in > languages/regex today. I'm also about to add a whole bunch of other > languages to the makefile. All languages SHOULD [1] have a "make test" Makefile target. > Also, what's the state of the nci tests? Is there any hope for them > under different OSes? Non operating specific extension like libnci should IMHO have better support in the C<loadlib> opcode. The file extensions (.so, .dll...) could be handled in the platform code. Windows AFAIK needs an export.def file. This could be autogenerated from the source (PARROT_DLL_EXPORT or such) by a small utility. > ... t/pmc/n.t is failing for me right now, but that's > probably because I have an ancient libnci.so that happens to be lying > around. Is everyone else just skipping this test? I'm always running nci.t. [1] rfc2119 leo
