On Thu, 21 Aug 2003, Benjamin Goldberg wrote: > I hope you aren't planning on serializing just a single isolated > microthread... that wouldn't work well with what I've got in mind due to > how much stuff comes along when you serialize a continuation -- you'd > get almost the whole interpreter serialized. > > If you want, instead, to serialize interpreter->microthreads, however... > well, you'd *still* get almost the whole interpreter serialized, but > you're getting more bang for your buck :)
Well how else are we going to implement squeak? :) Sincerely, Michal J Wallace Sabren Enterprises, Inc. ------------------------------------- contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] hosting: http://www.cornerhost.com/ my site: http://www.withoutane.com/ --------------------------------------
