On Fri, 22 Aug 2003, Benjamin Goldberg wrote: > Michal Wallace wrote: > > > > On Thu, 21 Aug 2003, Benjamin Goldberg wrote: > > > > > If you want, instead, to serialize interpreter->microthreads, > > > however... well, you'd *still* get almost the whole interpreter > > > serialized, but you're getting more bang for your buck :) > > > > Well how else are we going to implement squeak? :) > > Squeak uses synchronous communication channels, right? Writing blocks > until there's a reader, and reading blocks until there's a writer.
Beats me. I was kind of being silly. But squeak does save the state of the entire interpreter in an image file. :) Sincerely, Michal J Wallace Sabren Enterprises, Inc. ------------------------------------- contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] hosting: http://www.cornerhost.com/ my site: http://www.withoutane.com/ --------------------------------------
