On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 02:20:46AM -0400, David H. Adler wrote: > On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 12:57:11PM -0400, Gordon Henriksen wrote: > > This is really a language feature; you should add it to the hq9+ > > implementation. > > Sadly, this was not considered when hq9+ was developed, so it's not > actually part of the language. Maybe someone should develop and > extended version - hq9+42
No, hq9*6, surely? (if everyone is still in the dark about six by nine see http://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/0,,sid9_gci211501,00.html ) Which reminds me, we don't have an implementation of Beatnik yet, do we? Nicholas Clark
