At 1:39 PM +0200 9/6/02, Josef Hook wrote:
>On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>
>> At 1:40 PM +0100 9/5/02, Nicholas Clark wrote:
>> >I believe applying the patch is the right thing, because it's progress
>> >on where we are, but I think (not fully formed yet) that we would benefit
>> >from finer granularity on what can get modified
>>
>> Point. OK, put 'em in.
>
>Does this patch outdate my patch [perl #16934] ?
>
><change of subject>
>
>Come to think of it i dont believe we've discussed how we are going
>to pass sizes when initializing pmcs. I've just assumed that it was
>clear to everyone how we would do it. [perl #16934] makes this pasm syntax
>valid:
>
>new P0, MultiArray[2;2;2]
>
>with the old syntax it wouldnt work to pass multidims
>
>new P0, MultiArray, 2,2,2
>
>Dan what is the correct syntax?
new P0, .IntegerPMCType, P5
where P5 has the initialization doodad in it. I think it's going to
be an array of name/value pairs, but we may make it an array of Pair
PMCs.
--
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
