On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Dan Sugalski wrote: > At 1:40 PM +0100 9/5/02, Nicholas Clark wrote: > >I believe applying the patch is the right thing, because it's progress > >on where we are, but I think (not fully formed yet) that we would benefit > >from finer granularity on what can get modified > > Point. OK, put 'em in. Does this patch outdate my patch [perl #16934] ? <change of subject> Come to think of it i dont believe we've discussed how we are going to pass sizes when initializing pmcs. I've just assumed that it was clear to everyone how we would do it. [perl #16934] makes this pasm syntax valid: new P0, MultiArray[2;2;2] with the old syntax it wouldnt work to pass multidims new P0, MultiArray, 2,2,2 Dan what is the correct syntax? /Josef
- Re: [perl #17026] [PATCH] core.ops including #16838 Nicholas Clark
- Re: [perl #17026] [PATCH] core.ops including #16838 Leopold Toetsch
- Re: [perl #17026] [PATCH] core.ops including #16838 Sean O'Rourke
- Re: [perl #17026] [PATCH] core.ops including #16838 Leopold Toetsch
- Re: [perl #17026] [PATCH] core.ops including #16838 Leopold Toetsch
- Re: [perl #17026] [PATCH] core.ops including #16838 Dan Sugalski
- Re: [perl #17026] [PATCH] core.ops including #168... Nicholas Clark
- Re: [perl #17026] [PATCH] core.ops including ... Tom Hughes
- Re: [perl #17026] [PATCH] core.ops including ... Dan Sugalski
- Re: About core.ops patch and pasm syntax Josef Hook
- Re: About core.ops patch and pasm sy... Dan Sugalski
- Re: About core.ops patch and pas... Josef Hook
- Re: About core.ops patch and pas... Robert Spier
- Re: [perl #17026] [PATCH] core.ops including ... Leopold Toetsch
- Re: [perl #17026] [PATCH] core.ops includ... Dan Sugalski
- Re: [perl #17026] [PATCH] core.ops including #16838 Leopold Toetsch
- Re: [perl #17026] [PATCH] core.ops including #16838 Leopold Toetsch
- Re: [perl #17026] [PATCH] core.ops including #168... Nicholas Clark
- Re: [perl #17026] [PATCH] core.ops including ... Leopold Toetsch