At 10:16 AM -0600 7/30/02, Jonathan Sillito wrote:
>Hey, thanks for reading this over. It is not a typo, but it may be
>incorrect. My code does overwrite previous lexicals in enclosing scopes
>(i.e. lexicals in pads lower on the stack), but maybe I have the
>semantics of the store_lex op wrong?
Yup, lexical pads should go away and their effects go away when you
exit their scope. Fix that and this patch can go in, as it gets a
good chunk of the semantics we need.
--
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
