Steve Fink wrote: > > On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 08:43:17PM -0700, Steve Fink wrote: > > On Sat, May 04, 2002 at 11:14:06PM -0400, Jeff wrote: > > > Daniel Grunblatt wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sat, 4 May 2002, Steve Fink wrote: > > > > > > > > > Applied, with one change: the alignments of the three pools are now > > > > > #defined. > > > > > > > > > > > > > I believe your commit was incomplete. > > > > > > I'd have to agree. Some of the code appears to use 'last_PMC_Arena', > > > which isn't defined yet in include/parrot/resources.h. 'last_Arena' > > > appears to exist but is unused. > > > > Doh! Sorry. How the heck did my 'make test' succeed? (Yes, I should > > have done a make clean of some sort, but didn't.) > > > > How's that make.pl coming along? ;-) > > Argh! No, it was that annoying CVS problem again -- it often does > partial commits. Seems to be related to commits with multiple > directories in them. In this case, it only committed stuff in > include/parrot, and skipped all the stuff at the toplevel. Only I have > done many multi-directory commits to parrot successfully, too, so it's > not a reliable problem. > > I keep forgetting that this might happen (because I use CVS constantly > for my day job, and it never happens there.) Must be something to do > with the specialized access control stuff?
Beats me, but I've been there before too. I don't know if it's specific to us, but what I've ended up doing is checking out into a new directory and building there. In any case, don't worry too much about it. I've had the same thing happen too. As far as how make.pl is coming along, I haven't had too much time to dedicate to it recently, because the keyed aggregates are a higher priority. If there's a call to see this, then I'll check it in to a relatively isolated directory for others to look at. -- Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
