At 2:10 PM -0400 4/17/02, David Hand wrote:
>On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 01:40:39PM -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote:
>>  On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Andy Dougherty wrote:
>>  > If I had to guess, I'd guess this was the problem.  This is probably not
>>  > as heavily-tested a Configuration as the plain 'long' version, and most of
>>  > that has probably been on little-endian systems, while I'll guess that Mac
>>  > OS X is big-endian.
>>
>>  > Hmm.  You could try again with just 'long'.  I'll also try with 'long
>>  > long' on SPARC, which often uncovers such issues
>>
>>  Nope, bad guess on my part.  Parrot 0.0.5+ (checked out this morning)
>>  did just fine with 'long long' opcode_t and INTVAL on SPARC Solaris 8.
>
>Trying CVS parrot as of 1400 EDT (why not?), it still didn't work.
>Interestingly, typing "long" both times that Configure suggests "long
>long" doesn't work, either.  (I get what appears to be the same problem:
>scads of compiler errors/warnings, and fail basically all of the first
>few tests but test one.  I'm running late for something called "work"
>that might, ahm, be important for me to go to one of these days.)
Okay, that's bizarre. I'm going to try and track this down and see 
what I can do about that.

Reply via email to