At 2:10 PM -0400 4/17/02, David Hand wrote: >On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 01:40:39PM -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote: >> On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Andy Dougherty wrote: >> > If I had to guess, I'd guess this was the problem. This is probably not >> > as heavily-tested a Configuration as the plain 'long' version, and most of >> > that has probably been on little-endian systems, while I'll guess that Mac >> > OS X is big-endian. >> >> > Hmm. You could try again with just 'long'. I'll also try with 'long >> > long' on SPARC, which often uncovers such issues >> >> Nope, bad guess on my part. Parrot 0.0.5+ (checked out this morning) >> did just fine with 'long long' opcode_t and INTVAL on SPARC Solaris 8. > >Trying CVS parrot as of 1400 EDT (why not?), it still didn't work. >Interestingly, typing "long" both times that Configure suggests "long >long" doesn't work, either. (I get what appears to be the same problem: >scads of compiler errors/warnings, and fail basically all of the first >few tests but test one. I'm running late for something called "work" >that might, ahm, be important for me to go to one of these days.)
Okay, that's bizarre. I'm going to try and track this down and see what I can do about that.