At 11:31 AM 9/14/2001 -0500, Gibbs Tanton - tgibbs wrote:
>The patch assumes that your source code directory is named parrot. This may
>have been an invalid assumption, but it is going to be hard to do this patch
>unless we agree on the name of the source directory.
Hmmm. I think we need a reorg of the source directories, then. I'll get
with Simon and coordinate doing this. (It's going to make CVS *so* happy... :)
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Gregor N. Purdy
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: 9/14/2001 11:20 AM
>Subject: Half-completed parrot/parrot.h conversion?
>
>All --
>
>When I updated my sandbox this morning, I discovered that some files
>wanted includes from ./parrot/*.h. So, I had to create the directory
>manually, and did a bunch of ln foo.h parrot/foo.h's until I got no
>more complaints. Is someone in the middle of the change, or was it
>missed?
>
>Also, I had to edit my makefile to change '-I..' to '-I.' for things
>to work...
>
>
>Regards,
>
>-- Gregor
> _____________________________________________________________________
>/ perl -e 'srand(-2091643526); print chr rand 90 for (0..4)' \
>
> Gregor N. Purdy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Focus Research, Inc. http://www.focusresearch.com/
> 8080 Beckett Center Drive #203 513-860-3570 vox
> West Chester, OH 45069 513-860-3579 fax
>\_____________________________________________________________________/
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
