[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dan Sugalski) writes:
> At 11:31 AM 9/14/2001 -0500, Gibbs Tanton - tgibbs wrote:
> >The patch assumes that your source code directory is named parrot. This may
> >have been an invalid assumption, but it is going to be hard to do this patch
> >unless we agree on the name of the source directory.
>
> Hmmm. I think we need a reorg of the source directories, then. I'll
> get with Simon and coordinate doing this. (It's going to make CVS
> *so* happy... :)
If you (or Simon) make a list of files that needs to be moved, then I
can do it directly in the repository.
It'll screw up old labels and the ability to checkout a copy from,
say, last monday. But right now I would think that it is better to
keep the revision history.
- ask
--
ask bjoern hansen, http://ask.netcetera.dk/ !try; do();
