Re: SV: Parrot multithreading?

[Dan Sugalski]

At 05:23 PM 9/20/2001 -0400, Michael L Maraist wrote:
>There wasn't any code for CHECK_EVENTS w/in Parrot when I first read the 
>source-code.  I merely assumed that it's role was not-yet determined, but 
>considered the possible uses.  CHECK_EVENTS seems to be gone at the 
>moment, so it's a moot point.

There probably won't be any. The current thinking is that since the ops 
themselves will be a lot smaller, we'll have an explicit event checking op 
that the compiler will liberally scatter through the generated code. Less 
overhead that way.

                                        Dan

--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski                          even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                         have teddy bears and even
                                      teddy bears get drunk