On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 04:38:57PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote: > Nope. Internal I/O, at least as the interpreter will see it is async. You > can build sync from async, it's a big pain to build async from sync. > Doesn't mean we actually get asynchrony, just that we can. For clarification: do you mean async I/O, or non-blocking I/O? - Damien
- RE: Parrot multithreading? Hong Zhang
- Re: Parrot multithreading? Rocco Caputo
- Re: Parrot multithreading? Dan Sugalski
- RE: Parrot multithreading? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Parrot multithreading? Damien Neil
- Re: Parrot multithreading? Dan Sugalski
- RE: Parrot multithreading? Hong Zhang
- Re: Parrot multithreading? Damien Neil
- Re: Parrot multithreading? Dan Sugalski
- Re: SV: Parrot multithreading? Michael L Maraist
- Re: SV: Parrot multithreading? Dan Sugalski
- RE: Parrot multithreading? Hong Zhang
- RE: SV: Parrot multithreading? Michael Maraist
- Re: SV: Parrot multithreading? Benjamin Stuhl
- Re: SV: Parrot multithreading? Dan Sugalski