At 10:33 PM 9/13/2001 -0400, Uri Guttman wrote:
> >>>>> "DS" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> DS> Actually, I'm expecting almost nothing to be written in pasm after
> DS> we get a working parser and compiler. We might write template code
> DS> for the compiler in it, but that's probably about it. Well, other
> DS> than the JAPHs that aren't being written in APL or Intercal or
> DS> something. (I can see someone writing a befunge parser just for
> DS> the wacky JAPHs possible...)
>
>i envision some code being written in pasm for the same reason any code
>is written in assembler, speed and fine grained control.
Uhuh, sure. You just want too program in assembly again, admit it! :)
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
