Re: Patch to assembler/disassembler + parrot asm inconsistancies

[Dan Sugalski]

At 07:25 PM 9/10/2001 -0400, Bryan C. Warnock wrote:
>I think Dan mentioned this,  but it looks like the suffixes can be derived
>from the args being passed in.  That would greatly simply the assembler to
>just the function names: set, eq, add, branch.
>
>Were there problems with the scheme, is someone working on it, or did it
>fall through the cracks?  (I'm very much in favor of such a change, and will
>pick it up if no one else is working on it.)

No, I dont' think so, and yes, respectively. (Or, rather, we did the easy 
literal stuff first and planned on smartening up the assembler later. It's 
in the TODO even... :)

                                        Dan

--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski                          even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                         have teddy bears and even
                                      teddy bears get drunk