On Monday 10 September 2001 06:23 pm, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 05:23 PM 9/10/2001 -0500, Brian Wheeler wrote:
> >First off, here's an inconsistancy I found: In test.pasm
> >
> >REDO: eq_i_ic I2, I4, DONE, NEXT
> >
> >appears. Shouldn't this be comparing to a constant, not a register?
>
> Nope, though if I let you in on the actual secret it's help.
>
> That should really be eq_i_ic_ic. (Well, actually there should be only one
> label, and we fall through otherwise. It's a bug in implementation and
> assembly, not opcode name... :) The intention is the last _x covers the
> last arg, the next to last covers the next to last arg, and so on. When we
> run out, we repeat the innermost type.
Why are you doing right-to-left instead of left-to-right?
--
Bryan C. Warnock
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
