On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 12:13:11PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote: > Hmmm. Yes, in fact it should. That code will end up with a list of 65 > identical scalars in it. Bad Dan! No cookie for me. Damn. I guess that means we have to write a compiler after all. I was looking forward to having Dan assemble all my Perl 6 code for me. Simon
- Re: pads and lexicals Ken Fox
- Re: pads and lexicals Simon Cozens
- Re: pads and lexicals Dave Mitchell
- Re: pads and lexicals Ken Fox
- Re: pads and lexicals Dan Sugalski
- Re: pads and lexicals Dan Sugalski
- RE: pads and lexicals Garrett Goebel
- RE: pads and lexicals Dan Sugalski
- Re: pads and lexicals Dave Mitchell
- Re: pads and lexicals Dan Sugalski
- Re: pads and lexicals Simon Cozens
- Re: pads and lexicals Buddha Buck
- Re: pads and lexicals Ken Fox
- Re: pads and lexicals Dan Sugalski
- RE: pads and lexicals Brent Dax
- RE: pads and lexicals Brent Dax
- RE: pads and lexicals Dan Sugalski
- RE: pads and lexicals Dan Sugalski
- RE: pads and lexicals Brent Dax
- RE: pads and lexicals Dan Sugalski