At 10:45 AM 9/6/2001 -0400, Ken Fox wrote:
>Dave Mitchell wrote:
> > So how does that all work then? What does the parrot assembler for
> >
> > foo($x+1, $x+2, ...., $x+65)
>
>The arg list will be on the stack. Parrot just allocates new PMCs and
>pushes the PMC on the stack.
No, it won't actually. It'll be in a list. I'll get to that in a minute in
the next message.
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
- Re: pads and lexicals Simon Cozens
- Re: pads and lexicals Dave Mitchell
- Re: pads and lexicals Ken Fox
- Re: pads and lexicals Dave Mitchell
- Re: pads and lexicals Simon Cozens
- Re: pads and lexicals Dave Mitchell
- Re: pads and lexicals Ken Fox
- Re: pads and lexicals Simon Cozens
- Re: pads and lexicals Dave Mitchell
- Re: pads and lexicals Ken Fox
- Re: pads and lexicals Dan Sugalski
- Re: pads and lexicals Dan Sugalski
- RE: pads and lexicals Garrett Goebel
- RE: pads and lexicals Dan Sugalski
- Re: pads and lexicals Dave Mitchell
- Re: pads and lexicals Dan Sugalski
- Re: pads and lexicals Simon Cozens
- Re: pads and lexicals Buddha Buck
- Re: pads and lexicals Ken Fox
- Re: pads and lexicals Dan Sugalski
- RE: pads and lexicals Brent Dax
