> > For what it's worth, I like it.
>
> So do I, actually... it's sort of growing on me.

Me too. (I think it (~ for concat, ^ for negation) is just fine.)

The "clash" with =~ is disappointing though.

Now if Larry had the cahones to change the =~ operator...

(I find the notion of a short infix word, like 'in', somewhat appealing.
But I understand how easy it is to see this as more radical than is
really called for.)

Reply via email to