On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 11:49:21PM +0100, Simon Cozens wrote: > On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 10:31:22PM +0100, Graham Barr wrote: > > We can have a huge thread, just like before, but until we see any kind > > of update from Larry as to if he has changed his mind it is all a bit > > pointless. > > For what it's worth, I like it. > > > > Does anyone else see a problem with =~ ? > > Does anyone else see a problem with "$negated=~$scalar;" ? :) ...and for three points, guess what $foo=~0 does in Perl 5? -- $jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/ # There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'. # It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen
- ~ for concat / negation (Re: The Perl 6 Emulator) Nathan Wiger
- Re: ~ for concat / negation (Re: The Perl 6 Emulato... James Mastros
- Re: stealing something from plan9 os Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: ~ for concat / negation (Re: The Perl 6 Emulato... Graham Barr
- Re: ~ for concat / negation (Re: The Perl 6 Emulato... Simon Cozens
- Re: ~ for concat / negation (Re: The Perl 6 Emu... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: ~ for concat / negation (Re: The Perl 6 Emu... Bart Lateur
- RE: ~ for concat / negation (Re: The Perl 6 Emu... David Grove
- Re: ~ for concat / negation (Re: The Perl 6 Emulato... Russ Allbery
- Re: ~ for concat / negation (Re: The Perl 6 Emulato... Benjamin Stuhl
- Re: ~ for concat / negation (Re: The Perl 6 Emu... Dan Sugalski