On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 09:20:13AM -0700, Peter Scott wrote: > So, I wonder aloud, do we want to signify that degree of change with a more > dramatic change in the name? Still Perl, but maybe Perl 7, Perl 10, Perl > 2001, Perl NG, Perl* - heck, I don't know, I'm just trying to get the > creative juices flowing. As a data point, Python are currently in the middle of a Perl 6 style redesign, and are calling the result Python 3000. Maybe if we called it Perl 3000, we might be able to get a beta out by then. -- We *have* dirty minds. This is not news. - Kake Pugh
- Perl, the new generation Peter Scott
- Re: Perl, the new generation Larry Wall
- Re: Perl, the new generation Peter Scott
- Re: Perl, the new generation Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl, the new generation Adam Turoff
- Re: Perl, the new generation Michael G Schwern
- Re: Perl, the new generation Nathan Torkington
- Re: Perl, the new generation Larry Wall
- Re: Perl, the new generation Peter Scott
- RE: Perl, the new generation David Grove
- Re: Perl, the new generation Michael G Schwern
- RE: Perl, the new generation Peter Scott
- Re: Perl, the new generation Russ Allbery
- RE: Perl, the new generation David Grove