David Grove <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Unless Perl 6 is capable of parsing and running that 99.9% (or higher) > of Perl 5 scripts originally foretold, I foresee a far worse outcome for > Perl 6 than has happened for an almost universally rejected 5.6 and > 5.6.1. Most people don't adopt .0 releases. 5.6.1 was just released. Most of us who maintain large software deployments have a lag time of *at least* six months for picking up a new release of software. I know you like preaching doom and gloom, David, but you're several parsecs displaced from reality here. (And Perl 5.6.0 has been in Debian testing for a while, for that matter.) -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
- Re: Perl, the new generation Peter Scott
- Re: Perl, the new generation Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl, the new generation Adam Turoff
- Re: Perl, the new generation Michael G Schwern
- Re: Perl, the new generation Nathan Torkington
- Re: Perl, the new generation Larry Wall
- Re: Perl, the new generation Peter Scott
- RE: Perl, the new generation David Grove
- Re: Perl, the new generation Michael G Schwern
- RE: Perl, the new generation Peter Scott
- RE: Perl, the new generation Russ Allbery
- RE: Perl, the new generation David Grove
- Re: Perl, the new generation Michael G Schwern
- Re: Perl, the new generation Nathan Wiger
- Re: Perl, the new generation Larry Wall
- RE: Perl, the new generation David Grove
- Re: Perl, the new generation Nathan Wiger
- Re: Perl, the new generation Michael G Schwern
- Re: Perl, the new generation Nathan Torkington
- Re: Perl, the new generation Larry Wall
- RE: Perl, the new generation David Grove