Lightning flashed, thunder crashed and Nathan Wiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> whisper ed: | Michael G Schwern wrote: | > | > Oh, not to seed the clouds or anything, but what about "+=" and ".="? | > Any proposal will have to deal with those. | | Under what I originally posted: | | $a += "$b"; # string | $a += $b; # numeric You still haven't given a good explanation of $a += sub(); # is it a string or a number? Does your plan mean that we can no longer have subs that are context dependent? -spp
- Re: how about just juxtaposing? (Re: Sa... David L. Nicol
- Re: how about just juxtaposing? (R... Michael G Schwern
- Re: Sane "+" string concat proposal Stephen P. Potter
- Re: Sane "+" string concat proposal Nathan Wiger
- Re: Sane "+" string concat proposal Dan Brian
- Re: Sane "+" string concat proposal John Porter
- Re: Sane "+" string concat proposal Austin Hastings
- Re: Sane "+" string concat proposal Michael G Schwern
- Re: Sane "+" string concat proposal Casey West
- Re: Sane "+" string concat proposal Nathan Wiger
- Re: Sane "+" string concat propos... Stephen P. Potter
- Re: Sane "+" string concat pr... Dan Brian
- Re: Sane "+" string concat pr... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Sane "+" string conc... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Sane "+" string concat proposal jc vazquez
- recap on new operators? Dave Storrs
- Re: Sane "+" string concat proposal Simon Cozens
- Re: Sane "+" string concat proposal Bart Lateur
- Re: Sane "+" string concat proposal Stephen P. Potter
- Re: Sane "+" string concat propos... Bart Lateur