On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 08:32:09PM +0100, Michael G Schwern wrote: : On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 12:23:24PM -0700, Austin Hastings wrote: : > Some of the objections have gone by, but what if you reverse the : > quotes? : > Make operator-in-quotes be a string operator (hell, make that true for : > the other ops, too) : > : > Perl 5 Perl 6 : > --------------- --------------- : > -> . : > + + : > . "+" : > eq "=" or eq : > gt ">" or gt : : If we go this route, we may as well just use 'cc'. Much less typing : (no chording), less confusing, analagous to 'eq' and : 'gt'. I like 'cc' for that very reason. String operators should look the same, imho. -- Casey West
- Re: how about just juxtaposing? (Re: Sa... Casey West
- Re: how about just juxtaposing? (Re: Sa... Edward Peschko
- Re: how about just juxtaposing? (Re: Sa... David L. Nicol
- Re: how about just juxtaposing? (R... Michael G Schwern
- Re: Sane "+" string concat proposal Stephen P. Potter
- Re: Sane "+" string concat proposal Nathan Wiger
- Re: Sane "+" string concat proposal Dan Brian
- Re: Sane "+" string concat proposal John Porter
- Re: Sane "+" string concat proposal Austin Hastings
- Re: Sane "+" string concat proposal Michael G Schwern
- Re: Sane "+" string concat proposal Casey West
- Re: Sane "+" string concat proposal Nathan Wiger
- Re: Sane "+" string concat propos... Stephen P. Potter
- Re: Sane "+" string concat pr... Dan Brian
- Re: Sane "+" string concat pr... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Sane "+" string conc... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Sane "+" string concat proposal jc vazquez
- recap on new operators? Dave Storrs
- Re: Sane "+" string concat proposal Simon Cozens
- Re: Sane "+" string concat proposal Bart Lateur
- Re: Sane "+" string concat proposal Stephen P. Potter