Michael G Schwern wrote: > It is a servicable solution, just be ready for the extra problems. I like it; it seems to raise far fewer problems than it solves. In particular, it solves all the very thorny issues Dan enumerated. -- John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 David Grove
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 David M. Lloyd
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Andy Dougherty
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Jeff Okamoto
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 H . Merijn Brand
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Jeff Okamoto
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Piers Cawley
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Michael G Schwern
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Brian Wheeler
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Michael G Schwern
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Russ Allbery
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Michael G Schwern
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Simon Cozens
- Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's Apocalyp... Simon Cozens
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's Apocalyp... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's Apocalyp... Simon Cozens
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's Apocalyp... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's Apocalyp... Peter Scott