On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 09:58:05AM -0500, Brian Wheeler wrote: > Name tricks are ugly, but useful. Perhaps the best solution would > be to call the new interpreter perl6. If it finds itself being > called 'perl' or 'perl5' then it should assume perl 5 code I just worry about users not being aware of this. As I mentioned eariler, it was very common on systems that had perl4 as /usr/bin/perl and perl5 as /usr/bin/perl5. People would get these strange errors from perl and either not think to look at the version and/or not think that perl5 might be installed under another name. It was quite common. It is a servicable solution, just be ready for the extra problems. -- Michael G. Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/ Perl6 Quality Assurance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Kwalitee Is Job One ...and that, children, is how to clean and load a .38 revolver. Questions?
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Buddha Buck
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 David Grove
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 David M. Lloyd
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Andy Dougherty
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Jeff Okamoto
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 H . Merijn Brand
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Jeff Okamoto
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Piers Cawley
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Michael G Schwern
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Brian Wheeler
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Michael G Schwern
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Russ Allbery
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Michael G Schwern
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Simon Cozens
- Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's Apocalyp... Simon Cozens
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's Apocalyp... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's Apocalyp... Simon Cozens
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's Apocalyp... Dan Sugalski