At 07:01 PM 3/26/2001 -0500, John Porter wrote: >Dan Sugalski wrote: > > > > If we disallow changing the attributes on subs at runtime, > >Probably a good idea anyway, at least for a subset of attributes, >such as :idempotent (or :constant). Oh, it's a fine idea, and I'm personally all for it. Anything that reduces the uncertainty the optimizer sees is fine with me. :) It is, however, Larry's call, though I can certainly rattle off the things I'd like to see as options. Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Peter Buckingham
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Peter Buckingham
- Re: Schwartzian Transform James Mastros
- Re: Schwartzian Transform John Porter
- Re: Schwartzian Transform John Porter
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Russ Allbery
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Dan Sugalski
- Re: Schwartzian Transform John Porter
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Dan Sugalski
- Re: Schwartzian Transform John Porter
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Dan Sugalski
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Trond Michelsen
- Re: Schwartzian Transform John Porter
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Dan Sugalski
- Re: Schwartzian Transform John Porter
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Johan Vromans
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Edward Peschko
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Zenon Zabinski
- Re: Schwartzian Transform John Porter
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Brent Dax
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Randal L. Schwartz