Zenon Zabinski wrote: > Personally, I have never used the Schwartzian Transform ... > so I may not be fully knowledgeable of its usefulness. > > do you need to understand the > intricacies if you can just cut and paste and just change a few > variables? Not to be harsh, but you probably *do* need to understand the "intracacies" of the ST if you want to be able to contribute usefully to the resolution of this issue. -- John Porter
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Dan Sugalski
- Re: Schwartzian Transform John Porter
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Dan Sugalski
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Trond Michelsen
- Re: Schwartzian Transform John Porter
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Dan Sugalski
- Re: Schwartzian Transform John Porter
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Johan Vromans
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Edward Peschko
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Zenon Zabinski
- Re: Schwartzian Transform John Porter
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Brent Dax
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Dan Brian
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Uri Guttman
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Dan Brian
- RE: Schwartzian Transform Brent Dax
- Re: Schwartzian Transform John Porter
- Re: Schwartzian Transform James Mastros
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Mark Koopman