Re: PDD for code comments ????

[nick]

David L . Nicol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Nick Ing-Simmons wrote:
>
>> Perhaps we could teach pod that /* was alias for =pod
>> and */ an alias for =cut ?
>
>that won't work because pod/cut is strictly line-based and C-style
>comments are strictly stream-based.

I was not suggesting we hunt down  2 ** /* */ 14 / /* */ 17  type comments
I was just suggesting that pod could recognise line oriented block 
comments.

/*=for ...

*/

vs 

/*
=for ...

=cut
*/     

-- 
Nick Ing-Simmons