Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: > Some sort of simple markup embedded within the C comments. Hey, let's > extend pod! Hey, let's use XML! Hey, let's use SGML! Hey, let's use > XHTML! Hey, let's use lout! Hey, ... Either run pod through a pod puller before the C preprocessor gets to the code, or figure out a set of macros that can quote and ignore pod. The second is Yet Another Halting Problem so we go with the first? Which means a little program to depod the source before building it, or a -HASPOD extension to gcc Or just getting in the habit of writing /* =pod and =cut */ -- David Nicol 816.235.1187 [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Nothing in the definition of the word `word' says that a word has to be in a dictionary to be called one." -- Anu Garg
- PDD for code comments ???? David Mitchell
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? Simon Cozens
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? Simon Cozens
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? David L. Nicol
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? David L. Nicol
- Re: PDD for code comments ... Simon Cozens
- Re: PDD for code comments ... nick
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? David Mitchell
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? Nicholas Clark
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? David L. Nicol
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? David Mitchell
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? Dave Mitchell