Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> Some sort of simple markup embedded within the C comments. Hey, let's
> extend pod! Hey, let's use XML! Hey, let's use SGML! Hey, let's use
> XHTML! Hey, let's use lout! Hey, ...
Either run pod through a pod puller before the C preprocessor gets to
the code, or figure out a set of macros that can quote and ignore pod.
The second is Yet Another Halting Problem so we go with the first?
Which means a little program to depod the source before building it,
or a -HASPOD extension to gcc
Or just getting in the habit of writing
/*
=pod
and
=cut
*/
--
David Nicol 816.235.1187 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Nothing in the definition of the word `word' says that a
word has to be in a dictionary to be called one." -- Anu Garg
- PDD for code comments ???? David Mitchell
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? Simon Cozens
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? Simon Cozens
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? David L. Nicol
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? David L. Nicol
- Re: PDD for code comments ... Simon Cozens
- Re: PDD for code comments ... nick
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? David Mitchell
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? Nicholas Clark
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? David L. Nicol
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? David Mitchell
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? Dave Mitchell
