On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 02:05:19PM -0500, Stephen P. Potter wrote: > If they're going to have to go in and add a "require <6" already, its easier > to just modify the #! line (and less coding for us). Duh, <<smacks forehead>> the #! line. I'm awake now, though. ;) Grant M. I've gotta stop getting up before noon.
- PDD 2, vtables Dan Sugalski
- Re: PDD 2, vtables Branden
- RFC archive? Matthew Cline
- Re: RFC archive? Adam Turoff
- require < 6.x NeonEdge
- Re: require < 6.x Stephen P. Potter
- Re: require < 6.x Simon Cozens
- Re: RFC archive? NeonEdge
- Re: RFC archive? Ask Bjoern Hansen
- Re: PDD 2, vtables Tim Bunce
- Re: PDD 2, vtables Branden
- Re: PDD 2, vtables Simon Cozens
- Re: PDD 2, vtables Branden
- Re: PDD 2, vtables Dan Sugalski
- Re: PDD 2, vtables Dan Sugalski
- Re: PDD 2, vtables Branden
- Re: PDD 2, vtables Dan Sugalski
- Re: PDD 2, vtables Simon Cozens