Simon Cozens wrote: > > > =item logical_or > > > =item logical_and > > > =item logical_not > > > > Er, why not just use get_bool? > > Overloading. > Please see my previous post on the subject. As I pointed there, implementing || and && like that breaks short-circuits. - Branden
- RFC archive? Matthew Cline
- Re: RFC archive? Adam Turoff
- require < 6.x NeonEdge
- Re: require < 6.x Stephen P. Potter
- Re: require < 6.x Simon Cozens
- RE: require < 6.x NeonEdge
- Re: RFC archive? Ask Bjoern Hansen
- Re: PDD 2, vtables Tim Bunce
- Re: PDD 2, vtables Branden
- Re: PDD 2, vtables Simon Cozens
- Re: PDD 2, vtables Branden
- Re: PDD 2, vtables Dan Sugalski
- Re: PDD 2, vtables Dan Sugalski
- Re: PDD 2, vtables Branden
- Re: PDD 2, vtables Dan Sugalski
- Re: PDD 2, vtables Simon Cozens
- Re: PDD 2, vtables Branden
- Re: PDD 2, vtables Simon Cozens
- Re: PDD 2, vtables Alan Burlison
- Re: PDD 2, vtables Tim Bunce
- Re: PDD 2, vtables Jarkko Hietaniemi