Re: State of PDD 0

[Dan Sugalski]

At 02:15 PM 2/20/2001 -0700, Nathan Torkington wrote:
>Bryan C. Warnock writes:
> > Ask, all, are we reusing perl6-rfc as the submittal address, or will there
> > be a new one (perl-pdd)?
>
>I'm in favour of renaming to reflect the new use of the list.  Dan?

I've been thinking since I sent my last mail on this that we might actually 
want to leave the two (PDD & RFC) separate. Keep on with the RFCs for 
'external' things, and PDD for the actual internals implementation of things.

                                        Dan

--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski                          even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                         have teddy bears and even
                                      teddy bears get drunk