At 01:05 PM 2/20/2001 -0500, Bryan C. Warnock wrote:
>On Tuesday 20 February 2001 11:22, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > D'oh! Yes, mark it as Approved, or whichever step is past developing.
>(I'm
> > a little scattered at the moment, so I don't have the doc handy)
>
>Actually, now that I've been updating this, I'm going to hold it at
>development for a little while, if only because I have some more changes
>coming down the pike. (The actual formatting will stay the same, so I
>guess Simon would call these meta-meta-meta changes.)
Fair enough. PDD 0, version 2... :)
>Ask, all, are we reusing perl6-rfc as the submittal address, or will there
>be a new one (perl-pdd)?
Let's use perl-rfc for now.
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
