On Sat, Feb 17, 2001 at 05:00:51PM -0800, Peter Scott wrote: > Simon Cozens submitted a patch which failed the test ...and MJD and Jarkko and I worked on it and we put together something which was OK. -- You're not Dave. Who are you?
- Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN Peter Scott
- Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN Peter Scott
- Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN Edward Peschko
- Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN schwern
- Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN Peter Scott
- Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN Edward Peschko
- Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN schwern
- Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN Peter Scott
- Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN schwern
- Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN Peter Scott
- [PATCH perl.c] Fixing PERL5OPT (was Re: Warnings, strict... Simon Cozens
- [PATCH perl.c] Fixing PERL5OPT (was Re: Warnings, strict... schwern
- Re: [PATCH perl.c] Fixing PERL5OPT (was Re: Warnings, st... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: [PATCH perl.c] Fixing PERL5OPT (was Re: Warnings, st... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN Peter Scott
- Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN schwern
- Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN Edward Peschko
- Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN schwern
- Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN Edward Peschko
- Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN schwern
- RFC 362 - revisiting the RFC process (was Warnings, stri... Edward Peschko