On Sat, Feb 17, 2001 at 05:28:51PM -0800, Peter Scott wrote: > Why this difference depending on whether I reference a module with an > absolute path or a relative one? That's very, umm... interesting. Hmm. Post it to p5p, see what happens.
- Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN Edward Peschko
- Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN schwern
- Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN Peter Scott
- Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN schwern
- Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN Peter Scott
- Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN Simon Cozens
- [PATCH perl.c] Fixing PERL5OPT (was Re: Warnings, strict... schwern
- Re: [PATCH perl.c] Fixing PERL5OPT (was Re: Warnings, st... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: [PATCH perl.c] Fixing PERL5OPT (was Re: Warnings, st... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN Peter Scott
- Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN schwern
- Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN Edward Peschko
- Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN schwern
- Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN Edward Peschko
- Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN schwern
- RFC 362 - revisiting the RFC process (was Warnings, stri... Edward Peschko
- Re: RFC 362 - revisiting the RFC process Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: RFC 362 - revisiting the RFC process Edward Peschko
- RFC 362 - revisiting the RFC process (was Warnings, stri... Edward Peschko
- Re: RFC 362 - revisiting the RFC process (was Warnings, ... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 362 - revisiting the RFC process (was Warnings, ... Edward Peschko