Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return"

[Damian Conway]

   > Really?  Are lexicals in the sub visible in the post handler?

No. Only the original arguments and the return value.
   
   > (Of course I realize *F does not illustrate this...)

Exactly. ;-)

Actually, I do agree that Perl 6 ought to provide a universal "destructor"
mechanism on *any* block. For historical reasons, I suppose it should be
C<continue>, though I would much prefer a more generic name, such as
C<cleanup>.

Damian