Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return"

[Branden]

Simon Cozens wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 10:35:56AM -0500, John Porter wrote:
> > Or eliminate $ and @ from the language.  :-)  or rather :-/.
> 
> Well, you can do that now that
>     foo = bar;
> calls the AUTOLOADed lvalue sub foo. The rest of the implementation is
> left as an exercise for the reader. :)

Well, try that on strict 'subs'...

- Branden