At 12:29 AM 1/5/01 -0500, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote: >Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'm beginning to loathe software licenses in a *big* way, and I'm a half > > step away from saying to hell with it all and going fully public domain. > > (Or at least pushing for it, as I don't control perl's licensing terms) > > >Public domain has it's own troubles too. To be safe in doing a public >domain license, we'll need to get copyright disclaimers from everyone who >contributes code (and possibly their employers). Otherwise, someone could >come along later and legally claim copyright on some part. No worse than what we need now. Submitting code to perl places it under the license that perl uses, if it's to be included. Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk
- Re: standard representations Dan Sugalski
- Re: standard representations Uri Guttman
- Re: standard representations Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: standard representations Andy Dougherty
- Re: standard representations Dan Sugalski
- Re: standard representations Andy Dougherty
- Re: standard representations Dan Sugalski
- Re: standard representations Tim Jenness
- Re: standard representations Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: standard representations David Grove
- public domain? (was Re: standa... Dan Sugalski
- public domain? (was Re: standa... Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: standard representations Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: standard representations Andy Dougherty
- Re: standard representations Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: standard representations Dan Sugalski
- licensing issues (was Re: stan... Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: standard representations Uri Guttman
- Re: standard representations Dan Sugalski
- Re: standard representations Dan Sugalski
- Re: standard representations Peter Buckingham