On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Dan Sugalski wrote: > At 12:34 PM 1/2/01 -0500, Andy Dougherty wrote: > >If you want to experiment with modifying perl5's bigints and bigfloats > >with a tuned library to get an idea of how much speed we're talking about, > >gmp is probably the best bet to get a good estimate with the least amount > >of effort (though it doesn't look as if it's been ported to VMS, and it > >didn't build for me under Solaris 8 when I just tested it ...). If you > >want to redistribute the code, of course, then you need to think about > >licensing issues. > > I think gmp/fgmp is probably the best place to start, if I can get the fgmp > code building with enough abuse. It ought to be simple enough, and we'll > need to smack it around some for perl's memory management anyway. Math::GMP is on CPAN already. It does operator overloading. -- Tim Jenness JCMT software engineer/Support scientist http://www.jach.hawaii.edu/~timj
- Re: standard representations Daniel Chetlin
- Re: standard representations Dan Sugalski
- Re: standard representations Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: standard representations Dan Sugalski
- Re: standard representations Uri Guttman
- Re: standard representations Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: standard representations Andy Dougherty
- Re: standard representations Dan Sugalski
- Re: standard representations Andy Dougherty
- Re: standard representations Dan Sugalski
- Re: standard representations Tim Jenness
- Re: standard representations Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: standard representations David Grove
- Re: standard representations Dan Sugalski
- public domain? (was Re: standard representations) Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: standard representations Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: standard representations Andy Dougherty
- Re: standard representations Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: standard representations Dan Sugalski
- licensing issues (was Re: standard representations) Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: standard representations Uri Guttman